Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Grounds for Refusal of Planning Permission IV
It is considered that the proposed development by virtue of its substandard design and layout would represent an inappropriate and substandard form of urban development which would fail to provide an acceptable standard of residential amenity to future occupants. The proposed development would therefore set an undesirable precedent for poor quality living environments and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Lastly, thanks to Nikki:
Number 4
They are basically agreeing with the residents of Balreask Manor and Canterbrook and are saying that it is ugly, cheap and nasty and the developer has shown no imagination with its design and is preoccupied with stuffing as many houses into the land and making as much money as they can and not giving a hoot to the existing residents that the new development will affect and also the proposed new residents of the LAP3 lands.
Hope this will make it slightly easier for residents to understand, they do try to baffle people with their ‘speak’, only that I have had so much practice over the last while, I would be in the same boat.
Post a Comment